Siapakah yang akan diserang oleh Amerika Syarikat ?

Kezaliman Bashar al Assad dan rejimnya terhadap rakyatnya sendiri bukanlah satu rahsia lagi melainkan bagi mereka yang rabun dengan isu dunia antarabangsa. PBB sendiri telah menyatakan bahawa lebih 96,000 rakyat Syria telah terkorban di dalam tragedi yang berpanjangan sejak Mac 2011 yang lalu. Manakala beberapa laporan dalam Syria menyatakan bahawa jumlah jiwa yang telah terkorban telah pun melebihi 200,00 orang.

Baru-baru ini, rejim Bashar telah membunuh lebih daripada 3,000 rakyatnya dengan menggunakan bom kimia sekali lagi.

Adakah AS akan melakukan serangan terhadap Syria yang diterajui oleh Bashar al Assad, Pati Baath dan Syiah Alawi yang mendapat sokongan padu Hizbullah Lubnan, militia Syiah Iraq dan Republik Iran serta bantuan ketenteraan Cina dan Russia ?

Kenapa John Kerry, SU Amerika Syarikat mengadakan beberapa pertemuan sulit dengan Presiden Bashar al Assad sekiranya diktator yang zalim ini benar-benar musuh kepada AS ?

Ingat pengajaran daripada Peperangan Salib yang lampau apabila puak-puak Syiah telah bekerjasama dengan gabungan 22 negara Eropah sehingga terjajahnya Baitul Maqdis dan Palestin ke tangan Salib Eropah?

Semoga Allah menunjukkan jalan keluar yang terbaik buat umat ini dan diberikan kemenangan kepada pihak yang benar ! Bersabarlah wahai saudaraku di Bumi Sham kerana kemenangan akan bersamamu ! Maafkanlah kami di atas kelambatan dan kealpaan kami di dalam membantumu.....

-Dr Zainur Rashid Zainuddin-

di antara lawak Amerika Syarikat

John Kerry’s top 10 most embarrassing statements on SyriaJohn Kerry’s top 10 most embarrassing statements on Syria



Secretary of State John Kerry is leading the charge for airstrikes by the Obama Administration against Syria. The former Senator, however, has a shameful track record of appeasement of the brutal dictatorship in Damascus. During his time in the Senate, Kerry expended a great deal of effort in extending the hand of friendship to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, whom Hillary Clinton famously dubbed as a “reformer.” Significantly, during the Bush Administration years, Kerry was a fierce critic of Washington’s hardline stance against Assad, and worked hard to undercut the White House sanctions regime against Syria, advocating a policy of engagement with a state sponsor of terrorism and key ally of Iran. Here are ten of the most embarrassing statements by Mr. Kerry on Syria.

1. Speech at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, March 2011
“President Assad has been very generous with me in terms of the discussions we have had. And when I last went to – the last several trips to Syria – I asked President Assad to do certain things to build the relationship with the United States and sort of show the good faith that would help us to move the process forward.”

2. Damascus Press Conference, February 2009
“President Barack Obama's administration considers Syria a key player in Washington's efforts to revive the stalled Middle East peace process.”
“Syria is an essential player in bringing peace and stability to the region.”

3. Speech at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, March 2011
“So my judgment is that Syria will move; Syria will change, as it embraces a legitimate relationship with the United States and the West and economic opportunity that comes with it and the participation that comes with it.”

4. Opening Statement at Senate Nomination Hearing for U.S. Ambassador to Syria, March 2010
“I have long argued that America’s national security interests are well served by engaging with Syria.”
“I believe that with confident, carefully calibrated diplomacy, we can show Damascus what it stands to gain by moderating its behavior – and what it stands to lose by going in the other direction. To succeed, we must present Damascus with a clear choice and a vision of a different future.”

5. Statement following meeting with Assad, Damascus, January 2005
“I think we found a great deal of areas of mutual interest, some common concerns and some possibilities for initiatives that could be taken in the future to strengthening the relationship between the U.S. and Syria.”
“I leave here with a sense that we can improve our relationship. There are significant possibilities, particularly with the elections in Iraq and the elections in the West Bank … This is the moment of opportunity for the Middle East, for the U.S. and for the world. I hope that we would seize that opportunity.”

6. Speech to Brookings Institution, March 2009
“Loosening certain sanctions in return for verifiable changes in behavior could actually benefit US businesses. And the sanctions can always be tightened again if Syria backtracks.”

7. Boston Globe op-ed, January 2007
“To test the Syrians directly, as the Baker-Hamilton Commission suggested, Senator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut and I met with President Bashar al-Assad for more than two hours. The conversation confirmed my belief that engagement with Syria could be useful in advancing our objectives across the region. The Syrian leadership will act according to its own self-interest. The challenge is to get Syria's leaders to make a strategic decision to change direction, and shift their allegiance away from Iran.”
“This requires a package of incentives that will provide real benefits for playing a more constructive role and disincentives that will undermine their interests – if not endanger their survival – if they do not. These would be implemented incrementally, based on verified facts on the ground.”

8. Statement following meeting with Assad, Damascus, April 2010
“President Al-Assad and I had a very positive discussion on the formidable challenges facing this region and we found agreement on a number of ways in which both of us and other countries can contribute significantly to changing the dynamics that exist today,”

9. Washington Post op-ed, December 2006
“Another case where steadfastness long ago gave way to stubbornness is our approach to Iraq's neighbors. Last week in Damascus, Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut and I met with Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. We were clear about U.S. expectations for change in his regime's policies, but we found potential for cooperation with Syria in averting a disaster in Iraq — potential that should be put to the test. Washington can't remain on the sidelines, stubbornly clinging to a belief that talking to our enemies rewards hostile regimes.”

10. Comments in Cairo, before heading to Syria, December 2006
(Reported by Christian Science Monitor)
In a meeting with a small group of reporters in Cairo on Friday before heading on to Iraq and Syria, Senator Kerry was defiant about criticism that he was undermining the Bush administration's policies.
He said refusing to talk to these regimes is “a mistake … the kind of policy that's got us into trouble in the region, and it needs to change.”
He also was clear about what's prompting these sorts of visits. “Now that the Democrats are in control of Congress, we have an even larger responsibility to set a direction … as a counterbalance.”

Jews ‘furious’ over Scottish church saying they have no claim to Holy Land

Furious community says report ‘reads like an Inquisition-era polemic against Jews and Judaism’

JTA — Scottish Jews said they were “outraged” by a recent Church of Scotland paper which denies Jews any special claim to the land of Israel.

The report entitled “The Inheritance of Abraham” rejects “claims that scripture offers any peoples a privileged claim for possession of a particular territory” and says that “reconciliation can only be possible if the Israeli military occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem and the blockade of Gaza are ended.”

The Scottish Council of Jewish Communities said in a statement posted on its website Friday that the report published this week was “an outrage to everything that interfaith dialogue stands for” and “reads like an Inquisition-era polemic against Jews and Judaism.”

“The arrogance of telling the Jewish people how to interpret Jewish texts and Jewish theology is breathtaking,” the Jewish council said.

It declared that the report “closes the door on meaningful dialogue” and called on the church to withdraw it ahead of its forthcoming General Assembly.

Jodoh Itu Milik Kita Mustika HD (2013) ep 9

JIMK.E09 by eliteskin

Where are you going?

“Fa ayna tadh haboon – Where are you going?” There is such love in these words. It is like when a mother becomes helpless and dejected due to her child going astray, and she asks him “What are you doing?”

Such simple words as she says “What are you doing?” but the pain she feels, the pain of motherhood that she feels, hidden inside these simple words.

Or when the father becomes helpless and dejected and says “Son, What are you doing?” There is so much compassion in the father’s words knowing what his son is doing will spoil, ruin and harm his son’s future. At that time the father becomes so helpless and says these words “What are you doing? Where are you going? Which way are you headed? What have you become?”

“Fa ayna tadh haboon - Where are you going?” It is like a son reaching out to his angry father and saying “I am what is right for you, Where are you going? You are what is right for me, Where are you going? We are what is right for us, Where are you going? What are you doing? Who has decieved you?”

It is so easy to narrate these words, it is easy to copy these words, but the meaning behind these words, the emotion behind these words can’t be copied, can’t be reproduced, and can’t be translated. Not because they have no translation, not because they don’t have a deep meaning but because Emotions cannot be translated in words, they can only be felt.

Similarly when God says “Fa ayna tadh haboon” we can’t understand the emotion with which He means it. We can’t interpret the deep concern he has for us when he says “Where are you going” “Fa ayna tadh haboon” . We can’t understand the intensity of love, affection and concern with which He says it. We can’t understand it, we can maybe write about it, we maybe can try to enact it, we can maybe try to narrate it, but we can’t write the emotions, the concern and the intensity that come with it. We can’t. Because emotions cannot be translateded in words, they have to be felt.

And when Allah says “Yaa Ayuhal insaan” [O Mankind], the love He expresses to the whole 7 billion people in the world. “Yaa Ayuhal insaan” [O Mankind], not just Muslims, but the whole of mankind. Just one word “Yaa Ayuhal insaan” and the amount of love God has expressed in it. How can we ever translate the emotions that must go with it. The intensity with which He says “Yaa Ayuhal insaan” meaning [O Mankind]. It is like Allah coming to the earth, going to each individual and shaking him and saying “Yaa Ayuhal insaan” [O Mankind], “What have you done?”, “Fa ayna tadh haboon- Where are you going?” “Why have you left the path of righteousness?, Why have you left me? Just like when children abandon their parents and the mother says “Why are you going” The pain that is hidden in that “WHY”, that is of a mother, that pain is of a father. If we use that pain in analogy with God, all the while understanding Gods love is infinite, and then try to understand this word “Yaa Ayuhal inaan- Maa Gharaka birabikal kareem” meaning “O my creation, why have you left your Lord? Who has deceived you? I am your Lord, I am your Lord, Who has deceived you? Why have you left me?

[Ayah] Al lazi Kahalaqaqah meaning I created you, look at your appearence in the mirror and see how I created you. Can I wrong you? A mother does not wrong her child even though she is just a channel/medium, yet I have created you with my hands, can I wrong you? If I stop you from something, then there is wisdom behind it. If I tell you to do something, then there is wisdom behind it.

“Fa ayna tadh haboon – Where are you going?” Quran Surat At-Takwīr (The Overthrowing)(81:26)

God says in this Quranic verse – “Where are you going?” Quran Surat At-Takwīr (The Overthrowing)(81:26)

God also says in one of the Quranic verses [Ayah] – “Fa Firroo Ilallaah – Not there, come over here, come towards me, come towards the path that is right, that is free of sin”

It is the right time for us to ask ourselves the same question, “Where are we going?” “What are we doing?” “Where are we headed?” “What have we become?”

Is what we hear meant to be heard? Is what we see meant to be seen? Is what we do meant to be done? Is what we say meant to be said? Is what we think meant to be thought?

Again as God says in one of the Quranic verses [Ayah] – “Fa Firroo Ilallaah – Not there, come over here, come towards me, come towards the path that is right, that is free of sin”

-Maulana Tareeq Jameel-

Did Sulus Have Fake Rocks Too?

Folks say the Sulus who attacked Sabah were a little bit too well equipped. In the beginning they wore full military gear and carried full sets of weapons which awed our own VAT 69 commandos. Our boys also found out that their GPS equipment kept getting out of whack when they entered the Tanduo area. This means their GPS was being jammed. The Sulus had jamming equipment. Without a doubt the Sulus were a rag-tag band of villagers. Someone paid them, armed them, equipped them and promised them wild stuff which made them believe they could succeed. Even if they had the money, where did they get all these fancy equipment? You cant just buy jamming equipment from the local hardware shop. By the way the mamak guy from Penang has denied giving any money to Jamalul Kiram. "However, Ridhwan admitted giving money to another claimant to the Sulu throne, Sultan Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram." according to The Star here. The news is that he contributes donations to Moro charities. Anyway here is something about spying equipment that is buried inside artificial rocks or natural rocks which have been hollowed out. Even tree trunks are used to hide spying equipment. Israel spies on Russian fleet off Syrian coast' camouflaged spy rocks found on island to monitor navy ships. fake rock used to house Israeli spy equipment Israeli devices in artificial rocks found on uninhabited island off Syria camouflaged devices track Russian navy transmit real-time images via satellite back to Israel three large devices found on island opposite Syrian port of Tartous. port is home to a Russian naval facility Iranian ships also docked in Tartous Israeli "Shayetet 13" elite naval unit planted surveillance system infiltrated Syria via Dolphin class submarines to extract sample stones frogmen evaluated terrain for most effective location rocks closely resembled items seized in Lebanon in recent years Here are some pictures of spying gear hidden inside hollowed out rocks and tree trunks. The next time you go to the beach near navy or army bases at Sepanggar Bay, Lumut, Sungei Udang or Port Dickson dont scratch your butt or do your business behind any of the rocks. The rocks may be taking your picture : )) -OutSyedTheBox-

Sahabat Lama Dan Sahabat Baru Anwar Ibrahim

There is another interesting article by AIDC titled : Rakyat Perlu Kaji Mengapa Dr Sidek Baba Tinggalkan Anwar AIDCNews – 01/04/13 – Rakyat perlu mengkaji mengapa seorang tokoh ilmuan dan pendakwah seperti Prof. Datuk Dr. Sidek Baba akhirnya mengambil keputusan meninggalkan bekas sahabat karibnya, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim selepas hampir 40 tahun berkawan. Bekas peguam bela Anwar, Datuk Zulkifli Noordin dilaporkan Utusan berkata, jika benar Ketua Pembangkang mempunyai moral yang bersih, adalah mustahil ilmuan dihormati dan pendakwah yang mempunyai budi pekerti ‘tidak tercalar’ seperti Sidek sanggup meninggalkan sahabat karibnya itu. Prof Dr Sidek Baba who was close to Anwar Ibrahim for almost 40 years has now left him. Zulkifli Noordin who was Anwar's close friend and lawyer has not only left him but has now become Anwar's number one enemy or opponent. Then there is a list of people featured in the AIDC article who were close friends of Anwar Ibrahim who have now left him. Here are some pictures : Sahabat Lama Yang Telah Tinggalkan Anwar Ibrahim The first is of course YB Datuk Zulkifli Noordin. You can see in the pictures how close he was with Anwar Ibrahim and his family. Those were days when YB Zul would visit Anwar in jail. Below here, to the right of Zul (half hidden is lawyer Pawancheek Merican). The next here is Prof Dato Dr Sidek Baba. Prof Sidek Baba was among the earliest and most staunchest leaders of the ABIM. Now he has not only left Anwar Ibrahim but he also helps spread the word telling the truth about Anwar Ibrahim. Next up is Haji Ismail Mina : Ismail Mina was another one of the earliest founders of ABIM and close stalwarts around Anwar Ibrahim. He is highly regarded among the ABIM supporters and has significant influence among them. He is now campaigning actively against Anwar to discredit him. Here is Anwar Ibrahim's former Setiausaha Sulit by the name of Anuar Shaari. Anuar Shaari has also left Anwar and turned against him. Then you have Ezzam Mohd Noor. Ezzam was close not only with Anwar but also with Wan Azizah. He knew stuff that went on inside the house. At one time the Head of Pemuda PKR. Now he is one of the most vocal critics against Anwar Ibrahim. There are plenty more but these will suffice for now. So a lot of Anwar's oldest friends, those who were his staunch supporters for 30 years and 40 years have left him. Or those who were with him in PKR have also left him. Many of them who have left him are Malay Muslims. Sahabat baru yang sangat disayangi Anwar Ibrahim But Anwar Ibrahim has moved along in life without the help of his Malay Muslim friends. Now he has newer friends. Here are some of them: Picture above - Anwar with his good friend Bill Cohen. Below here is Anwar's even closer friend Paul Wolfowitz. Paul Wolfowitz was of course involved in many scandals. Below here is a cozy picture of Anwar Ibrahim with both Bill Cohen and Paul Wolfowitz. Picture above shows Anwar with another good friend Al Gore. Picture below shows Al Gore with some of his friends in Washington. No need to say where this picture was taken. You can trace the source of the picture. Closer to home - this is also one of Anwar Ibrahim's staunchest supporters. She is a YB as well. No need to say where or how this picture was taken. It was a 'soal peribadi'. Below here is another staunch supporter of Anwar Ibrahim. Pakailah baju kurung or baju kebaya. Kita kan orang Malaysia? Air hostess Sinapore Airlines pun pakai baju kebaya. Below : Another new friend of Anwar Ibrahim who has replaced his old friends. You can see for yourself kawan Melayu dah kurang. Nothing good or bad kalau kawan Melayu dah kurang. I am not racist ok. More Melayus have left him. Thats all. It is just an observation. And many of his new friends are bukan Melayu. Below : Another friend of Anwar Ibrahim who is 'bukan Melayu'. This one needs serious anti-rabies shots. Last but not least the Yindians. Wan liddle, two liddle, three liddle Yindians.. Err ..one Tamil, one Singh and one Kotte Inilah al kisah sahabat lama dan sahabat baru Anwar Ibrahim.